top of page
Search

The Prompt Isn’t the Point: A Repeatable AI Workflow for L&D Teams

  • Writer: Mark Livelsberger
    Mark Livelsberger
  • 3 days ago
  • 3 min read

Random AI prompting feels like a guessing game. You ask for training content, get inconsistent drafts, then scramble to fix errors, clarify facts, and manage SME feedback. This chaos wastes time, lowers trust in AI tools, and leaves teams frustrated. If you lead learning and development, instructional design, or training, you know this pain well.


Better prompts alone won’t solve this. The key is a repeatable workflow that turns AI from a wild card into a reliable partner. This post breaks down a practical five-phase workflow that brings clarity, speed, and quality to AI-powered training development.



Eye-level view of a training manager reviewing a digital storyboard on a laptop
Training manager reviewing storyboard on laptop


Why Prompts Aren’t Enough


Prompts get all the hype, but they are just one piece of the puzzle. A great prompt can spark a good draft, but without a clear process, you’ll still face:


  • Conflicting SME feedback

  • Unclear training goals

  • Repeated rework cycles

  • Low confidence in AI outputs


A workflow creates structure. It defines what to do, when, and how AI fits in. This builds consistency and speeds up delivery without sacrificing quality.



The Five-Phase AI Workflow for L&D Teams


This workflow covers every step from understanding the problem to measuring impact. Each phase includes the goal, inputs, outputs, where AI helps, and a practical prompt you can use right away.


1. Intake


Goal: Define the real business problem, target audience, constraints, and success metrics.


Inputs: Stakeholder interviews, existing data, training requests.


Outputs: Clear problem statement, audience profile, constraints list, success criteria.


Where AI helps: Summarize stakeholder input, draft problem statements.


Prompt example:

“Summarize these notes into a clear training problem statement with audience and success metrics.”



2. Draft


Goal: Create a detailed outline with learning objectives, storyboard skeleton, and scenarios or knowledge checks.


Inputs: Intake outputs, subject matter content.


Outputs: Training outline, storyboard draft, sample scenarios.


Where AI helps: Generate outlines, draft scenarios, suggest knowledge checks.


Prompt example:

“Create a training outline with objectives and 3 scenario-based knowledge checks for [topic].”



Close-up of a digital storyboard with learning objectives and scenarios displayed
Digital storyboard showing learning objectives and scenarios


3. Review


Goal: Verify content accuracy, identify contradictions or TBDs, prioritize must-have vs nice-to-have elements, and limit review rounds.


Inputs: Draft materials, SME feedback.


Outputs: Verified content, list of open questions, prioritized feature list.


Where AI helps: Highlight contradictions, track open items, summarize SME comments.


Prompt example:

“List contradictions and open questions in this draft and separate must-have from nice-to-have items.”



4. Deploy


Goal: Ensure accessibility, manage version control, complete pilot and launch checklists, and prepare communication blurbs.


Inputs: Finalized content, accessibility guidelines, launch plan.


Outputs: Accessible training, version history, pilot feedback plan, communication materials.


Where AI helps: Generate accessibility checklists, draft launch emails.


Prompt example:

“Create a checklist to verify accessibility compliance for this training module.”



5. Measure


Goal: Develop a simple evaluation plan with leading and lagging metrics, manager observation points, and iteration schedule.


Inputs: Success criteria, deployment data.


Outputs: Evaluation plan, metric dashboard, iteration roadmap.


Where AI helps: Suggest evaluation questions, draft observation checklists.


Prompt example:

“Draft an evaluation plan with leading and lagging metrics for this training program.”



High angle view of a manager reviewing training evaluation metrics on a tablet
Manager reviewing training evaluation metrics on tablet


Guardrails for Using AI in L&D


AI can speed up development but requires guardrails to avoid pitfalls:


  • Never invent facts. Use “TBD” for unknowns.

  • Protect confidential information.

  • Watch for bias and accessibility issues.

  • Maintain a single source of truth for content.

  • Always include human review before publishing.

  • Follow a consistent style guide for tone and format.


These guardrails keep your training trustworthy and inclusive.



Quick Example: How Workflow Cuts Rework and Speeds Delivery


A training manager needed a compliance course fast. Instead of random AI prompts, they followed this workflow:


  • Intake clarified the exact compliance gap and audience.

  • Draft phase produced a clear outline and scenarios.

  • SME review focused on verifying facts, not rewriting.

  • Deployment included accessibility checks and a pilot launch.

  • Measurement tracked manager observations and learner feedback.


Result: The course launched two weeks earlier with fewer revisions and higher SME trust.



How to Start Using This Workflow Today


  • Map your current process against these five phases. Identify gaps.

  • Start small: apply the workflow to one project and refine.

  • Use the example prompts to guide AI interactions and keep outputs consistent.


If you’re ready to stop treating AI like a guessing game and start using it as a reliable part of your training process, we can help. At Live Learning and Media, we implement practical AI-enabled workflows that reduce rework, speed development, and improve stakeholder confidence—without sacrificing quality.


Reach out if you want to explore a short pilot sprint to prove value quickly.


Mark Livelsberger

Live Learning and Media LLC



 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page